Hi all. Here's another project to explore and if you wish to participate. I would like to know the shortcomings and weaknesses of the project, get recommendations to address them and improve. Invited representatives of a pair of "big" companies working with startups, but the cause of interest could not (probably for the reasons set forth below), try to work with as stakeholders J.
If you try to very briefly - we are talking about the service, which aims to flatten each other authors / inventors (regardless of their level of knowledge in any field), investors (regardless of the size of the available capital) and professionals / organizations specializing in providing any services or manufacture: to develop feasibility studies, business plans, management, patenting and everything else.
If a little more detail:
Premise underlying the proposal:
"-" 1) in Russia has a huge number of ideas that can and should be implemented (in various stages of readiness), and 2) for the implementation of these ideas requires investment (and not always great), and 3) to attract investment we need a serious package of documents (including a feasibility study and patents), and 4) to obtain a patent and feasibility studies are required finances and most importantly, relevant knowledge, and 5) even if (real accessibility) of the above, there are many authors who are themselves unwilling or unable to engage in their projects - it is easier to give them on a kind of outsourcing, but such proposals have not - almost all similar projects require the direct participation of the author. 6) in any case, serious investors are willing to work more with big companies than amateur writers.
"+" 1) It is now in Russia and the world is flourishing different payment systems (webmoney, cards, etc.) on which private capital is concentrated in large volume (about this says the growth of Internet commerce), which requires investments (eg Forex) + increase in bank deposits, and 2) there is a huge number of companies offering to solve any technical problems - from feasibility studies to obtain a patent or the organization of production.
Pros and cons of course, not all contingencies, and - any of them can be viewed in its context as a "+" or as "-" and turn into one another.
As a general rule (which applies not only to me) people are coming up with something new that is Inventors are poor administrators. Probably more than one thousand projects (maybe even a very promising) during the year goes to nowhere (or over the hill) as a result of attempts to lay their own to implement them. Unfortunately acting on the current system of selection and financing of new projects do not eliminate the problem. And www.inno.ru and www.innofond.ru and others suggest just the author's participation in the launch of services / production, its management, or at least competently made a business plan or the initial investment. As a result, through such competitions does not pass most of the projects, and the past are at greater risk elimination in the first year of existence. Similarly, in the field of Internet projects - if a person has the idea of an interesting project (be it a thousand times interesting) - for his introduction he needed to learn web technologies (it is possible and easy, not for nothing that we have a single "professionals Web design, but why should I learn that I do not know), have the means to order the introduction (this is always the problem of J), or a business plan if someone advises to take out a loan - which is again a problem.I want to say - all have to deal with professionals, including the implementation of ideas.
Originality (I think) offered me the service in the distribution of risks and reduce them to all participants, the evaluation system and project finance practical realization of which I found online, unfortunately, not able to (try to explore all the links on the Russian-speaking counterparts to send).
The proposed service will be taken to the idea of food. Evaluate their effectiveness will be the market (rather than a group of experts), rather investors themselves. If they feel that the draft party is profitable, invest their funds. Given that participate in the financing can be anyone with any means - will be a large number of experts and investment. Minimum requirements will determine the effectiveness of the market - if the project party is not interesting - there will be no money, he zagnetsya (and vice versa - if the money will be invested in the unpromising project, then the investor made a mistake). Will also be no one to complain. But if the draft party is successful they will receive the full benefit.
Author of the idea should specify the percentage of future income, he expects and intends to participate in a project (for a conditional draft And let it be 10%). The remaining investors can count on the remaining income, if consent to the proposed conditions. Further, the system applies a phased funding system. Professional firm / firms file their applications for the preparation of feasibility studies or other phases of this project, each of which offers savings Counting. For example the project but some company will offer to prepare a market research and feasibility studies for the month and the XXXX rubles, some for two, but for yyyy rubles, someone well-known brand and so on. Investor (s) which are interested in the project - refers to this case as it can / want rubles (for the corresponding counting). Once the personal account of the project reached required for this phase sum, the organizer of the service will be given the appropriate order. Given that this is still one of the most risky stage - the percentage of people who contributed to this money will be used for example a factor of 2 (or a defined percentage, eg 10% of the value of the future of the organization).
If the project requires obtaining patents - similarly, the companies file their applications and organizer of the orders granted a patent. Persons who have funded this stage be able to share in proportion to such 5% or their funds will take into account a factor of 1.5. It may also be more other steps, such as advertising campaign to attract investment, the order to attract investors, the attraction of the management company, etc. Naturally, all work will be performed only by specialized organizations. These individuals (investors) will actually take risks, because if the project did not receive further investment - they have their money back did not get it. But if successful, their share in the project (and thus profit) will be much higher investment. After the funding of venture unit - investors can have on competition to determine who to appoint a project manager. Perhaps they will choose the author of the draft - if he can prove their professional ability, or pick someone else or do it will be some sort of management company.
The remaining investors have come to a finished project with a low risk and a full set of professional documents. But a person involved in the last stage of low risk and can rely only on the balance of interest. All these factors need to share or rely on each project separately (eg when writing a feasibility study), or to make universal. In the first stage as a major investor can be considered private and specialized venture capital firms, the second phase is already possible to attract larger investors, pension funds, or participate in the standard investment / innovation competition.
General Terms: Choosing the Executive will be available from the majority of investors funding this stage of + the previous stages (votes proportionately invest an amount including factors). At each stage - the service organizer, first for a specified period of time will accumulate funds at a special personal account of the project. Once the required amount will be accumulated - to begin is the choice of singer and financing activities.If, within a specified period required amount will not be recruited - all potential investors in this phase will get their money back. The term may be defined as the organizer and investor - for instance, he gives money for 6 months if 6 months funds have been collected it will be able to demand money back - that is, each investor is already decided for themselves. What has already been spent in the previous stages of course is not returned, but if you can sell the work (research results, patents) - then it's done and the income distributed on-agreed proportion. It almost goes on long-term investments (like buying a stock company, to return during the implementation can not be - just someone to sell something). How to manage resources and how to earn an income (from operating activities as a dividend or from the sale of the project) will address investors themselves - is the question of withdrawal of funds and guarantees.
Profit service will be mainly formed due to the commission received from partners (artists) for orders in the system + can lay into each project party to its small share (it's in the future) + possible interest from the scroll of the temporary account.
The advantage of the system: the inventor is not necessary to prepare complex documentation to obtain a patent, to delve into the technology, with someone to negotiate and even participate in the management often they do not want to - here it is eliminated, for it working professionals. The investor is also working with the professionals (and not with the authors of enthusiasts who are almost always initially overestimate their project and if possible) - that a definite plus. Moreover, the investor can be anyone available though the ruble. For professionals (who sells stages), this project means a vast market with guaranteed financing. The owners of service will receive an income as a partner service companies, may want to organize the company and, finally, the commission raised from the project to participating funds and income from participation in future projects. With this approach I think is also less chance that the idea will be stolen - why steal when you can buy almost the entire project at the initial stage. In addition to ideas involving the placement of patents describe the project site will give 6 month formal priority to obtain a patent if the idea is really worth - probably during this time you can collect a small fee from investors at that stage. As you can see the risk of all participants are minimized, and where he is - repeatedly justified. In the Invention of Russia, actually a social and patriotic-oriented project- Participation should be for large companies and investors and a good fashion advertising. Risks to the organizers for this are minimal - only invest in a service organization. For investors, it is like a system of financial flashmob. If I have to webmoney lying around 5 dollars - why not invest in interesting projects that once could be the second ... J. Very often in the media appear descriptions of projects with huge market potential (including such as this one), but realize that do not come from the company or the state. At the same private individuals not own finances, and access to these projects, too, not (as in inno.ru). It remains only to feel a sense of frustration and waiting for the arrival of these products from abroad. Here and will prove useful, such a system.
Tried to describe as I could, though perhaps not entirely clear. If you have questions - ask, I will try to answer.All interest, terms and definitions are given for example J if you want can offer your own.
I almost forgot to such a long test of the most important - and this project is proposed to run in similar conditions:
- You can read the description above,
- I want to say 10% of the shares in the future project:), participation in management - not necessarily.
I suppose that first it is necessary: to conduct marketing research, develop a detailed business plan with the study of legal points and choosing the type of legal entity, registered company, obtaining the necessary documentation, to create a site capable of receiving, processing and displaying descriptions of projects, their support, involvement, Incorporation of performers,
There are currently required to run the following information / person / organization:
1) Proposals for the stages, the algorithm of the project (what must be done / ordered at first that later), determining the order of distribution of shares of participants in stages.
2) willing to administer the project-lead (about yourself, experience, opportunities, timing, cost, etc.);
3) willing to participate as performers (such as programmers, experts, designers, banks, who will do a business plan and other (about yourself, experience, opportunities, timing, cost, etc.);
4) to attract investors to participate in the first stages of the implementation of the selected (they will choose the artist and stage).
5) In general, any sensible suggestions conducive to the creation of
The idea of service to establish joint projects
Lord, as a rule, I place on this site ideas that someone has, somewhere, once implemented. Described below, the project is in concept stage. I was approached by its author, Ildar, asking their opinion. I decided to do better and with the consent of the author to place a description of the ideas on this site. Maybe you can give its assessment of its viability and suggest ideas on how you can develop and refine.